The
Purplemath Forums 
Rational Expressions: More Simplifying (page 3 of 3) Sections: Finding the domain, Simplifying rational expressions
Many students will try to do something like the following: Is this legitimate? Can the student really do this? (Think "bleeding, oozing...") You can NOT cancel termbyterm! You can ONLY cancel factors! So the first thing I have to do (if I'm going to do the simplification correctly) is factor the numerator and the denominator: Since the numerator and denominator share a common factor, I can reduce the expression as: Can I reduce any further? For instance, can I cancel off the x's? (whimpering, bleeding...) Can I cancel a 2 out of the 4 and the 6? (oozing, flopping...) No! This is as simplified as it's going to get, because there are no remaining common factors. Then the answer is: Depending on your text, you might not need that "for x not equal to ^{–5}/_{2} part". However, since I cancelled off a "2x + 5" factor, this removed a divisionbyzero problem from the original rational expression: 2x + 5 = 0 for x = ^{–5}/_{2}.
The factors in the numerator and denominator are almost the same, but not quite, so they can't be cancelled — yet. If the fraction had been: Copyright © Elizabeth Stapel 20032011 All Rights Reserved
...(that is, plusses instead of minuses), I could have rearranged the terms as: ...and cancelled to get "1", since order doesn't matter in addition. But order mostdefinitely does matter in subtraction, so I can't just flip the subtraction to get matching factors. However, take a look at this: 5 – 3 = 2
Do you see what happened?
When I reversed the subtraction in the second line, I got the same number
but the opposite sign. Then, if I flip a subtraction, I'll need to change
the sign. So I can reverse one of the subtractions in the original rational
expression above, as long as I remember to switch the sign out front: Now I can cancel: Remember: If "nothing" is left, then a "1" is left, so: (Depending on the text you're using, you may or may not need the "as long as x does not equal 2" part.) You should keep this "flip a subtraction and kick a 'minus' sign out front" trick in mind. Depending on the text you're using, you may see a lot of this.
To simplify this, I first need to factor. Then I can cancel off any common factors. Then the answer is: (You might not need the "for all x not equal to –3" part.)
To simplify this, I need to factor; I'll also need to flip the subtraction in the denominator, so I'll need to remember to change the sign. Then the answer is: (You might not need the "for all x not equal to 6" part.) As you have probably noticed by now, simplifying rational expressions involves a lot of factoring. If you're feeling at all rusty on this topic, review now: simple factoring, factoring quadratics, and special factoring formulas. << Previous Top  1  2  3  Return to Index



Copyright © 20032012 Elizabeth Stapel  About  Terms of Use 




