Most functions are not straight lines, so you should expect to need to know how to graph the absolute values of quadratics, cubics, and other types of functions. Fortunately, the process for graphing absolute-value functions involving arguments which are curvy lines is exactly the same as for absolute-value functions whose arguments are nicely linear plots. In other words, you'll be doing the regular graphing procedure, but you'll probably be flipping part of the "regular" graph (that is, the graph of the function inside the absolute-value bars) over the x-axis.
Content Continues Below
The simplest non-linear function is a quadratic, which normally graphs as a parabola. If any portion of that parabola crosses the x-axis, then the absolute-value bars will flip that portion over that axis.
Inside the absolute-value bars of this function, I've got a quadratic. Without the absolute-value bars, the graph of the quadratic inside the bars is a generic parabola.
I can confirm (by factoring) that the x-intercepts are at x = –1 and x = 4. I can use a formula to confirm that the vertex is at (1.5, –6.25). The y-intercept is at y = –4.
The "regular" parabola's graph looks like this:
Content Continues Below
Between the two x-intercepts, the graph goes below the x-axis, which means that the output values from the function (that is, the y-values) are negative. But the quadratic is inside absolute-value bars, and those bars will flip that negative part in the middle, redrawing that portion to be above the x-axis. So I should expect the graph to look like this:
So now I have a good idea of what I should expect my absolute-value graph to be. (I did the above "thinking" on scratch-paper; it will not be part of my hand-in answer. But doing this pre-check is very helpful, by reinforcing what I've learned previously.)
Here's my T-chart:
Advertisement
I've got two consecutive x-values with the same y-value. This doesn't mean that there's a horizontal line between (1, 6) and (2,–6); instead, it means that the vertex is halfway between these two x-values, and a little bit above the y-values. I'll want to be careful to draw a nice arc between these two points.
My graph looks like this:
Affiliate
They've given me the absolute value of a cubic. From what I know about the behavior of polynomials, I know that the cubic inside the absolute-value bars comes up from the bottom, maybe flexes a bit in the middle, and then heads upward forever. Since I'll be using the absolute values, I know that the left-hand segment of the graph will be flipped up and over the x-axis.
I can find the x-intercepts by factoring.
x3 – 5x2 + 6x = 0
x (x2 – 5x + 6) = 0
x (x – 3) (x – 2) = 0
x = 0, 2, 3
I'll need some additional plot points, to be certain of where the graph is going. My T-chart, without the computations, is:
Together with the intercepts that I found, my graph ends up looking like this:
If there had been no absolute-value bars on the function above, then the first and third segments of the line in my graph would have been below the x-axis. The absolute-value bars forced those two segments above the axis. If you're ever at all in doubt of where the graph should be going, take the time to plot some more points (such as the (2.5, 0.625) point I found above) so you can be certain of your answer before you hand it in.
URL: https://www.purplemath.com/modules/graphabs2.htm
© 2019 Purplemath. All right reserved. Web Design by 