The
Purplemath Forums 
Place Value: Whole Numbers (page 2 of 3) Sections: Concepts, Wholenumber place values, Decimal place values Our fingers are called "digits", and so also are the numerals 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. ("Numerals" means "number characters".) We use these ten digits, along with the concept of place value, in exactly the same sense that we were using our fingers and our piles of marbles: a certain "place" tells us what unit we're working with, and the digit tells us how many we need of that unit. So, for instance, the expression "264" means "two 100s, plus six 10s, plus four 1s", because hundreds, tens, and ones are what are stored in those particular places. In "expanded notation", "264" can be written as: 200 + 60 + 4 = 2×100 + 6×10 + 4×1 Our placevalue system is called the "decimal" system, because it's based on "all my fingers" being "ten fingers"; that is to say, the "base" of our number system is ten. We start with ones, being our fingers (that is, our counting "units"). Then we go to tens, being sets of fingers. Then we go to ten sets of sets of fingers, which is 10×10 = 100; that is, we go to hundreds. In other words, every time we go one "place" further to the left (that is, every time we go into a unit that is one times bigger than the previous place's unit), we multiply by our base of ten:
The commas marking off sets of three digits, like the comma between the 1 and the 0 in "1,000", are used to make it easier for people to read the numbers. Properly, if you spell out a number in words, you should use commas at those same spots. So "1,234" would be spelled out as "one thousand, two hundred thirtyfour". Also, there should not be an "and" between the "hundred" and the "thirtyfour"; you should not pronounce "234" as "two hundred 'and' thirtyfour". Yes, I know that's how most people say it; it's still wrong. Copyright © Elizabeth Stapel 2013 All Rights Reserved
To "expand" this number, I need to split it up into its different places. If I'm not sure of my places, I'll count them out, starting from the righthand digit. This number has five digits. From the table above (if I haven't memorized this information yet), I know that this means that I'm dealing with tens of thousands. The one comma tells me that I'm dealing with thousands, too; one comma means I'm into the thousands, two commas would have meant I'm into the millions, and so forth. So I've got three 10,000s, two 1,000s, zero 100s, six 10s, and seven 1s. Usually, we ignore the zeroes in expanded notation, so this gives me: 30,000 + 2,000 + 60 + 7
I've got nine thousands, three hundreds, and two ones. I don't have any tens in the expanded form, so I'll need to use a zero in the tens place to keep that slot open. Then my standard form is: 9,000 + 300 + 0 + 2 = 9,302
a) The 2 is immediately to the left of the comma. I only have the one comma, so I know this number only goes into the thousands. In the thousands, I've got "52", so the 2 is in the thousands place. (The 5 is in the tenthousands place.) b) The tens place is the second place, just to the left of the 3 in the ones place. There is a 7 in this second place, so the digit in the tens place is 7.
The commas break this number into digestible pieces. The "285" is in terms of ones, tens, and hundreds of ones (or of just "regular numbers", in extremely informal language). The "937" is in terms of ones, tens, and hundreds of thousands. And the "622" is in terms of ones, tens, and hundreds of millions.
So the number they gave me, when I spell it out in words, is six hundred twentytwo million, nine hundred thirtyseven thousand, two hundred eightyfive. << Previous Top  1  2  3  Return to Index Next >>



Copyright © 2013 Elizabeth Stapel  About  Terms of Use 




