|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Solving Quadratic Inequalities: Examples (page 2 of 3)
The two associated two-variable equations in this case are y = 2x2 + 4x and y = x2 – x – 6.
As you can see, it is hard to tell where the green
line (y = 2x2
+ 4x) is above the blue line 2x2 + 4x
> x2 – x – 6
This last inequality is simpler to deal with because now all I have to do is find the zeroes of y = x2 + 5x + 6 (which is easy) and then pick the correct intervals based on just the one parabola (which is also easy). That is, it is simpler to compare one parabola with the x-axis than to compare two parabolas with each other. But since the one parabola (y = x2 + 5x + 6) came from combining the two original parabolas ("paraboli"?), the solution to the simpler one-parabola inequality will be the same as the solution to the original two-parabola inequality. Since the solutions will be the same, I'll work with the simpler case. I have simplified "2x2 + 4x > x2 – x – 6" to get "x2 + 5x + 6 > 0". The associated two-variable equation is y = x2 + 5x + 6. First, I'll find the zeroes (that is, the x-intercepts): x2 + 5x +
6 = 0 These two intercepts split the number-line into three intervals, namely x < –3, –3 < x < –2, and x > –2. On which of these three intervals is y = x2 + 5x + 6 above the x-axis? Since y = x2 + 5x + 6 graphs as a right-side-up parabola, it is above the axis on the ends:
Then the solution is: x < –3 or x > –2 Why was this solution "or equal to", rather than just "greater than" or "less than"? Because the original inequality was "or equal to", so the boundary points, the zeroes (the x-intercepts), are included in the solution. Copyright © Elizabeth Stapel 2006-2008 All Rights Reserved
First, I'll find the zeroes:
Hmm... Since there is a negative inside the square root, there must not be any x-intercepts. That is, this quadratic is either always above the x-axis or else always below, because it never crosses.
So when is y = x2 + x + 1 greater than zero (above the axis)? Always! Then the solution is: all x The above solution could also be stated as "all real numbers" or written as the interval from negative infinity to positive infinity.
This looks just like the previous problem, except that now I'm looking for where the parabola is below the axis. I already know that there are no x-intercepts. Also, because this is a right-side-up parabola, I know that the graph is always above the axis. So where is y = x2 + x + 1 less than zero? Nowhere! Then the solution is: no x The above solution could also be stated as "no solution" or as "the empty set", represented by the character "Ø". Whenever you have a quadratic inequality where the associated quadratic equation does not have real solutions (that is, the associated parabola does not cross the x-axis), the solution to the inequality will either be "all x" or "no x", depending upon whether the parabola is on the side of the axis that you need. << Previous Top | 1 | 2 | 3 | Return to Index Next >>
|
|
|
|
Copyright © 2006-2008 Elizabeth Stapel | About | Terms of Use |
|
|
|
|
|
|