Maximim / Minimum Geometry Word Problems

I'll let the length be L and the width be w. I have 128 meters of fencing, so the perimter equation is:

Dividing by 2 to make things simpler, I get:

Previously, they would have given me the perimeter and area and I would have had to find the length and width. This time, they told to find the area; in particular, they told me to find the *largest* area, given this perimeter. How do I do that?

Let's look at the area equation:

I can substitute for either one of these variables by solving the perimeter equation:

I can plug this into the area equation:

After substitution and simplification, my area equation has become a quadratic. I'm supposed to find the maximum, so I need to find the vertex. Since the above area equation is a negative quadratic, then it graphs as an upside-down parabola, and the vertex is the maximum.

There are a couple different ways of finding the vertex. I'll take the easy way. The equation of this quadratic, arranged in y = ax² + bx + c format, is:

The vertex of a parabola is the point (h, k), where the maximizing value is at . In this case, this formula gives me:

To find the "k" part of the vertex — which is the maximum value for the area — all I do is plug 32 in for w:

My points from this equation are (w, A) — that is, I plug in a width and figure out the area — so the h is the maximizing width and the k is the maximum area. So the answer for the maximum area is:

I know that this maximum occurs when the width is 32 meters. Now I also need to find the length, because the original question asked about the "significance" of the dimensions. Since w = 32, then:

Then the length and width are the same: 32 meters. What do you call a rectangle that is as wide as it is long? A square. So the second part of the answer is:

To help me see what I'm doing, I first draw a picture:

The total area A for the two paddocks will obviously be A = Lw. The total length of fencing gives me the total "perimeter" (in quotes, because I'm also including that shared line down the middle, so this isn't the "regular" perimeter). Then:

I can't do much with this, but what if I solve this for one of the variables, and then plug that into the "area" formula? Let's see...

Now I'll plug this into the area formula:

This is a negative quadratic, just like the previous exercise, and I'll find the maximum area in the same way: by finding the vertex. First, I'll find the maximizing value for the width:

So I will get the maximum area when the input (the width, in this case) has a value of 200. Reviewing my picture and equations, I see that the width should be 200 feet, the overall length should be 300 feet, and each paddock should then be 150 feet long.

To set this up, I need to find an expression for the shaded area, and then I need to figure out how to make that as small as possible. I'll start by labelling.

Because the rectangle's bottom lies within the base of the triangle, then I know that the rectangle's vertical sides form right angles with the base of the triangle. Because the triangle is isosceles, I know that each half (that is, each portion on either side of the altitude line up the middle) of the triangle is the same. Also, the small shaded triangles at the bottom corners of the larger triangle are similar to half of the original triangle.

I'll label the base of one of the smaller triangles as b and the height of that triangle has h. The other smaller triangle will have the exact same dimensions. And, by subtraction, the height of the shaded triangle on top must be:

So I have the following:

The shaded areas are then given by:

Adding together the two small corner triangles and the bigger one on top, the total area of shading is given by:

But this area expression has too many variables. I need to get rid of one of them. Looking at one of the bottom-corner triangles, I can use the similarity of this corner triangle and half of the surrounding triangle (which, being half of the isosceles triangle, has a base length of 8 units) to get:

I can use this to replace b in my "area to be minimized" expression:

This is a positive quadratic in h, which means that it graphs as an upward-opening parabola, so the minimizing point will be at the vertex. I can use the formula to find the minimizing value of h:

This is the minimizing value of the height h of the rectangle. The base of the rectangle is then . Looking back at the exercise, while the picture contained no units, the problem statement did: centimeters. I will need to include that unit in my answer.